#include main() { int n, m; printf("Enter a number: "); scanf("%d", &n); m = fact(n); printf("The factorial of %d is %d.\n", n, m); exit(0); } fact(n) int n; { if (n == 0) return(1); return(n * fact(n-1)); } title='Atom feed' href='https://git.distanz.ch/cgit.cgi/linux/net-next.git/atom/Documentation/devicetree?h=nds-private-remove' type='application/atom+xml'/>
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorH. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>2016-10-27 14:31:39 +0200
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>2016-10-28 18:22:40 +0100
commitba14fa1a57c07cca9d520ceded8d3da5beb6175f (patch)
tree6902785e6d95c519b7f2ec5bcf65ae260d79d54d /Documentation/devicetree
parent1001354ca34179f3db924eb66672442a173147dc (diff)
regulator: core: silence warning: "VDD1: ramp_delay not set"
commit 73e705bf81ce ("regulator: core: Add set_voltage_time op") introduced a new rdev_warn() if the ramp_delay is 0. Apparently, on omap3/twl4030 platforms with dynamic voltage management this results in non-ending spurious messages like [ 511.143066] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 511.662322] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 513.903625] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 514.222198] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 517.062835] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 517.382568] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 520.142791] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 520.502593] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 523.062896] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 523.362701] VDD1: ramp_delay not set [ 526.143035] VDD1: ramp_delay not set I have observed this on GTA04 while it is reported to occur on N900 as well: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178371 This patch makes the warning appear only in debugging mode. Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/devicetree')