| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Some time ago glibc did not yet have inotify support, which forced
several applications (including inotail) to ship their own copy of the
required headers.
Especially considering that this also requires updating the syscall
numbers each time a new architecture wants to get supported it's the
best to instead switch to #include <sys/inotify.h> now.
|
|
Also do some cleanup work.
|
|
I should build on all of these now:
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=inotail
|
|
glibc already defines the inotify syscall numbers on some architectures.
This should fix the following warning on arm and hppa:
In file included from inotail.c:37:
inotify-syscalls.h:50:1: warning: "__NR_inotify_init" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:25,
from inotify-syscalls.h:13,
from inotail.c:37:
/usr/include/asm/unistd.h:344:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from inotail.c:37:
inotify-syscalls.h:51:1: warning: "__NR_inotify_add_watch" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:25,
from inotify-syscalls.h:13,
from inotail.c:37:
/usr/include/asm/unistd.h:345:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from inotail.c:37:
inotify-syscalls.h:52:1: warning: "__NR_inotify_rm_watch" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/sys/syscall.h:25,
from inotify-syscalls.h:13,
from inotail.c:37:
/usr/include/asm/unistd.h:346:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
|
|
According to the Linux source it's:
* s/linux/Linux/
* s/Kernel/kernel/
* s/Inotify/inotify/ (except at the beginning of a sentence)
|
|
Don't know whether it is correct to set myself as copyright holder as I only
drew this file together from various source in the kernel source, but all of
them stating no copyright information.
|
|
Update syscall numbers and add them for some more architectures
|
|
|
