diff options
author | Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> | 2016-12-15 23:00:55 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2016-12-17 11:43:23 -0500 |
commit | 5cb2cd68ddf9a13af36cec633006c0f2bdfb300a (patch) | |
tree | 1f33fd5c6275bae24cd7f03b8f5a6bb8766e6c6f /Documentation | |
parent | 10a3ecf49b681af49bf1b4f3fcf00115059a0ac6 (diff) |
sctp: sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport should be protected by rcu_read_lock
Since commit 7fda702f9315 ("sctp: use new rhlist interface on sctp transport
rhashtable"), sctp has changed to use rhlist_lookup to look up transport, but
rhlist_lookup doesn't call rcu_read_lock inside, unlike rhashtable_lookup_fast.
It is called in sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport and sctp_addrs_lookup_transport.
sctp_addrs_lookup_transport is always in the protection of rcu_read_lock(),
as __sctp_lookup_association is called in rx path or sctp_lookup_association
which are in the protection of rcu_read_lock() already.
But sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport is called by sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc, it
doesn't call rcu_read_lock, which may cause "suspicious rcu_dereference_check
usage' in __rhashtable_lookup.
This patch is to fix it by adding rcu_read_lock in sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc
before calling sctp_epaddr_lookup_transport.
Fixes: 7fda702f9315 ("sctp: use new rhlist interface on sctp transport rhashtable")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions