net-next.git - net-next plumbings

diff options

Diffstat (limited to 'include/xen/tmem.h')

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions

e/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst?id=89e9f7bcd8744ea25fcf0ac671b8d72c10d7d790'>sound/soc/intel/atom/sst parenta782b5f986c3fa1cfa7f2b57941200c6a5809242 (diff)

x86/PCI: Ignore _CRS on Supermicro X8DTH-i/6/iF/6F

Martin reported that the Supermicro X8DTH-i/6/iF/6F advertises incorrect host bridge windows via _CRS: pci_root PNP0A08:00: host bridge window [io 0xf000-0xffff] pci_root PNP0A08:01: host bridge window [io 0xf000-0xffff] Both bridges advertise the 0xf000-0xffff window, which cannot be correct. Work around this by ignoring _CRS on this system. The downside is that we may not assign resources correctly to hot-added PCI devices (if they are possible on this system). Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42606 Reported-by: Martin Burnicki <martin.burnicki@meinberg.de> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org

Diffstat (limited to 'sound/soc/intel/atom/sst')

`pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>

Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/primitives/asm')


context:
space:
mode: