#include #include #include #include #include #include #include static int xen_dbgp_op(struct usb_hcd *hcd, int op) { #ifdef CONFIG_PCI const struct device *ctrlr = hcd_to_bus(hcd)->controller; #endif struct physdev_dbgp_op dbgp; if (!xen_initial_domain()) return 0; dbgp.op = op; #ifdef CONFIG_PCI if (dev_is_pci(ctrlr)) { const struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ctrlr); dbgp.u.pci.seg = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus); dbgp.u.pci.bus = pdev->bus->number; dbgp.u.pci.devfn = pdev->devfn; dbgp.bus = PHYSDEVOP_DBGP_BUS_PCI; } else #endif dbgp.bus = PHYSDEVOP_DBGP_BUS_UNKNOWN; return HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_dbgp_op, &dbgp); } int xen_dbgp_reset_prep(struct usb_hcd *hcd) { return xen_dbgp_op(hcd, PHYSDEVOP_DBGP_RESET_PREPARE); } int xen_dbgp_external_startup(struct usb_hcd *hcd) { return xen_dbgp_op(hcd, PHYSDEVOP_DBGP_RESET_DONE); } #ifndef CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK_DBGP #include EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_dbgp_reset_prep); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_dbgp_external_startup); #endif ivate-remove'>nds-private-remove net-next plumbingsTobias Klauser
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/usb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /tools/usb
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/usb')