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bootstrap code */ master net-next plumbingsTobias Klauser
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/nfs/nfs3_fs.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /fs/nfs/nfs3_fs.h
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfs/nfs3_fs.h')