:100000008F027D00F904420E850CED14E914FA14F8
:10001000360EF70EFF1FFF1FB914E00000000000AE
:100020000000000000000000BD14E000000000001F
:100030000000000000000000D514E00000000000F7
:1000400000000000000000000000000000000000B0
:100050000000000000000000C114E00000000000EB
:100060000000000000000000000000000000000090
:100070000000000000000000000000000000000080
:100080000000000000000000000000000000000070
:100090000000000000000000C814E00000000000A4
:1000A000000000000000000000062000EE14E00048
:1000B000000000000000000080FF3000460E9400A9
:1000C0000082030000201000430EE000000000004A
:1000D000000000000000000006003000FB14E000FB
:1000E0000000000000000000000000000000000010
:1000F0000000000000000000000000000000000000
:1001000000000000000000000000000000000000EF
:100110000000000000000000416E90003C0E8000D6
:10012000390EE00000000000FD6E9000FD0E900012
:10013000F80EE000000000000000000000000000D9
:1001400000000000000000000000000000000000AF
:10015000000000000000000000000000000000009F
:10016000000000000000000000000000000000008F
:10017000000000000000000000000000000000007F
:10018000000000000000000000000000000000006F
:10019000000000000000000000000000000000005F
:1001A000000000000000000000000000000000004F
:1001B000000000000000000000000000000000003F
:1001C000000000000000000000000000000000002F
:1001D000000000000000000000000000000000001F
:1001E000000000000000000000000000000000000F
:1001F00000000000000000000000000000000000FF
:1002000000000000000000000000000000000000EE
:0B02100000000000000000002A362E55
:00000001FF
/********************************************************/
/* Micro code for the 8086:1229 Rev F/10 */
/********************************************************/
cgit.cgi/linux/net-next.git/log/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5433.h'>logtreecommitdiff
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the
following double-lock bug:
Double lock:
1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236;
2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after;
3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753;
4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505.
I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski.
First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions
`pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids
the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'.
NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes
`list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock',
whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by
`pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly
`pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under
`pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'.
Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and
`pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is
only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already
held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from
`pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from
`pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of
`pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there
cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points.
Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>