#include #include #include #include /* * /proc/softirqs ... display the number of softirqs */ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v) { int i, j; seq_puts(p, " "); for_each_possible_cpu(i) seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i); seq_putc(p, '\n'); for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) { seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]); for_each_possible_cpu(j) seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j)); seq_putc(p, '\n'); } return 0; } static int softirqs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { return single_open(file, show_softirqs, NULL); } static const struct file_operations proc_softirqs_operations = { .open = softirqs_open, .read = seq_read, .llseek = seq_lseek, .release = single_release, }; static int __init proc_softirqs_init(void) { proc_create("softirqs", 0, NULL, &proc_softirqs_operations); return 0; } fs_initcall(proc_softirqs_init); > net-next plumbingsTobias Klauser
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>2017-01-11 15:36:20 +0000
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>2017-01-18 16:32:44 +0000
commitb98acbff9a05b371c5f0ca6e44a3af8ce9274379 (patch)
treed6835885f859a456e62ce93621041138d6a54f9b /tools/perf/Documentation/perf-script-python.txt
parentd00b74613fb18dfd0a5aa99270ee2e72d5c808d7 (diff)
regulator: twl6030: fix range comparison, allowing vsel = 59
The range min_uV > 1350000 && min_uV <= 150000 is never reachable because of a typo in the previous range check and hence vsel = 59 is never reached. Fix the previous range check to enable the vsel = 59 setting. Fixes CoverityScan CID#728454 ("Logially dead code") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/Documentation/perf-script-python.txt')
ath+0x13/0x94 - i915 unpin_work workqueue: intel_unpin_work_fn+0x58/0x140 [i915] process_one_work+0x1f1/0x480 worker_thread+0x48/0x4d0 kthread+0x101/0x140 and this patch purely papers over the issue by adding a NULL pointer check and a WARN_ON_ONCE() to avoid the oops that would then generally make the machine unresponsive. Other callers of i915_gem_object_to_ggtt() seem to also check for the returned pointer being NULL and warn about it, so this clearly has happened before in other places. [ Reported it originally to the i915 developers on Jan 8, applying the ugly workaround on my own now after triggering the problem for the second time with no feedback. This is likely to be the same bug reported as https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98829 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99134 which has a patch for the underlying problem, but it hasn't gotten to me, so I'm applying the workaround. ] Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/builtin-trace.c')