#ifndef __DRM_FB_CMA_HELPER_H__
#define __DRM_FB_CMA_HELPER_H__
struct drm_fbdev_cma;
struct drm_gem_cma_object;
struct drm_fb_helper_surface_size;
struct drm_framebuffer_funcs;
struct drm_fb_helper_funcs;
struct drm_framebuffer;
struct drm_fb_helper;
struct drm_device;
struct drm_file;
struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2;
struct drm_plane;
struct drm_plane_state;
struct drm_fbdev_cma *drm_fbdev_cma_init_with_funcs(struct drm_device *dev,
unsigned int preferred_bpp, unsigned int num_crtc,
unsigned int max_conn_count, const struct drm_fb_helper_funcs *funcs);
struct drm_fbdev_cma *drm_fbdev_cma_init(struct drm_device *dev,
unsigned int preferred_bpp, unsigned int num_crtc,
unsigned int max_conn_count);
void drm_fbdev_cma_fini(struct drm_fbdev_cma *fbdev_cma);
void drm_fbdev_cma_restore_mode(struct drm_fbdev_cma *fbdev_cma);
void drm_fbdev_cma_hotplug_event(struct drm_fbdev_cma *fbdev_cma);
void drm_fbdev_cma_set_suspend(struct drm_fbdev_cma *fbdev_cma, int state);
int drm_fbdev_cma_create_with_funcs(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
struct drm_fb_helper_surface_size *sizes,
const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs *funcs);
void drm_fb_cma_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *fb);
int drm_fb_cma_create_handle(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
struct drm_file *file_priv, unsigned int *handle);
struct drm_framebuffer *drm_fb_cma_create_with_funcs(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_file *file_priv, const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd,
const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs *funcs);
struct drm_framebuffer *drm_fb_cma_create(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_file *file_priv, const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd);
struct drm_gem_cma_object *drm_fb_cma_get_gem_obj(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
unsigned int plane);
int drm_fb_cma_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
struct drm_plane_state *state);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
struct seq_file;
int drm_fb_cma_debugfs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg);
#endif
#endif
ref='/cgit.cgi/linux/net-next.git/commit/include/drm/drm_dp_dual_mode_helper.h?id=91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a'>commitdiff
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the
following double-lock bug:
Double lock:
1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236;
2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after;
3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753;
4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505.
I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski.
First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions
`pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids
the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'.
NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes
`list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock',
whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by
`pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly
`pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under
`pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'.
Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and
`pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is
only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already
held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from
`pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from
`pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of
`pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there
cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points.
Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>