/* * Purna Chandra Mandal, * Copyright (C) 2015 Microchip Technology Inc. All rights reserved. * * This program is free software; you can distribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License (Version 2) as * published by the Free Software Foundation. * * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License * for more details. */ #ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_MICROCHIP_PIC32_H_ #define _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_MICROCHIP_PIC32_H_ /* clock output indices */ #define POSCCLK 0 #define FRCCLK 1 #define BFRCCLK 2 #define LPRCCLK 3 #define SOSCCLK 4 #define FRCDIVCLK 5 #define PLLCLK 6 #define SCLK 7 #define PB1CLK 8 #define PB2CLK 9 #define PB3CLK 10 #define PB4CLK 11 #define PB5CLK 12 #define PB6CLK 13 #define PB7CLK 14 #define REF1CLK 15 #define REF2CLK 16 #define REF3CLK 17 #define REF4CLK 18 #define REF5CLK 19 #define UPLLCLK 20 #define MAXCLKS 21 #endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_MICROCHIP_PIC32_H_ */ ected='selected'>master net-next plumbingsTobias Klauser
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/paste_unaligned.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/paste_unaligned.c
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/paste_unaligned.c')