#ifndef _SCSI_SCSI_EH_H #define _SCSI_SCSI_EH_H #include #include #include struct scsi_device; struct Scsi_Host; extern void scsi_eh_finish_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, struct list_head *done_q); extern void scsi_eh_flush_done_q(struct list_head *done_q); extern void scsi_report_bus_reset(struct Scsi_Host *, int); extern void scsi_report_device_reset(struct Scsi_Host *, int, int); extern int scsi_block_when_processing_errors(struct scsi_device *); extern bool scsi_command_normalize_sense(const struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, struct scsi_sense_hdr *sshdr); extern int scsi_check_sense(struct scsi_cmnd *); static inline bool scsi_sense_is_deferred(const struct scsi_sense_hdr *sshdr) { return ((sshdr->response_code >= 0x70) && (sshdr->response_code & 1)); } extern int scsi_get_sense_info_fld(const u8 * sense_buffer, int sb_len, u64 * info_out); extern int scsi_ioctl_reset(struct scsi_device *, int __user *); struct scsi_eh_save { /* saved state */ int result; enum dma_data_direction data_direction; unsigned underflow; unsigned char cmd_len; unsigned char prot_op; unsigned char *cmnd; struct scsi_data_buffer sdb; struct request *next_rq; /* new command support */ unsigned char eh_cmnd[BLK_MAX_CDB]; struct scatterlist sense_sgl; }; extern void scsi_eh_prep_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, struct scsi_eh_save *ses, unsigned char *cmnd, int cmnd_size, unsigned sense_bytes); extern void scsi_eh_restore_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd* scmd, struct scsi_eh_save *ses); #endif /* _SCSI_SCSI_EH_H */ ivate-remove'>summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /net/decnet/netfilter/Makefile
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/decnet/netfilter/Makefile')