#undef TRACE_SYSTEM #define TRACE_SYSTEM cpuhp #if !defined(_TRACE_CPUHP_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) #define _TRACE_CPUHP_H #include TRACE_EVENT(cpuhp_enter, TP_PROTO(unsigned int cpu, int target, int idx, int (*fun)(unsigned int)), TP_ARGS(cpu, target, idx, fun), TP_STRUCT__entry( __field( unsigned int, cpu ) __field( int, target ) __field( int, idx ) __field( void *, fun ) ), TP_fast_assign( __entry->cpu = cpu; __entry->target = target; __entry->idx = idx; __entry->fun = fun; ), TP_printk("cpu: %04u target: %3d step: %3d (%pf)", __entry->cpu, __entry->target, __entry->idx, __entry->fun) ); TRACE_EVENT(cpuhp_multi_enter, TP_PROTO(unsigned int cpu, int target, int idx, int (*fun)(unsigned int, struct hlist_node *), struct hlist_node *node), TP_ARGS(cpu, target, idx, fun, node), TP_STRUCT__entry( __field( unsigned int, cpu ) __field( int, target ) __field( int, idx ) __field( void *, fun ) ), TP_fast_assign( __entry->cpu = cpu; __entry->target = target; __entry->idx = idx; __entry->fun = fun; ), TP_printk("cpu: %04u target: %3d step: %3d (%pf)", __entry->cpu, __entry->target, __entry->idx, __entry->fun) ); TRACE_EVENT(cpuhp_exit, TP_PROTO(unsigned int cpu, int state, int idx, int ret), TP_ARGS(cpu, state, idx, ret), TP_STRUCT__entry( __field( unsigned int, cpu ) __field( int, state ) __field( int, idx ) __field( int, ret ) ), TP_fast_assign( __entry->cpu = cpu; __entry->state = state; __entry->idx = idx; __entry->ret = ret; ), TP_printk(" cpu: %04u state: %3d step: %3d ret: %d", __entry->cpu, __entry->state, __entry->idx, __entry->ret) ); #endif /* This part must be outside protection */ #include ooth/ecc.h?id=16a16cd35ee29d9bea54dd60e55d9c1cc685a37d'>treecommitdiff
input type='hidden' name='h' value='nds-private-remove'/>
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /net/rxrpc/local_object.c
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/rxrpc/local_object.c')