#undef TRACE_SYSTEM #define TRACE_SYSTEM skb #if !defined(_TRACE_SKB_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) #define _TRACE_SKB_H #include #include #include /* * Tracepoint for free an sk_buff: */ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb, TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb, void *location), TP_ARGS(skb, location), TP_STRUCT__entry( __field( void *, skbaddr ) __field( void *, location ) __field( unsigned short, protocol ) ), TP_fast_assign( __entry->skbaddr = skb; __entry->location = location; __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol); ), TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%p", __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location) ); TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb, TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), TP_ARGS(skb), TP_STRUCT__entry( __field( void *, skbaddr ) ), TP_fast_assign( __entry->skbaddr = skb; ), TP_printk("skbaddr=%p", __entry->skbaddr) ); TRACE_EVENT(skb_copy_datagram_iovec, TP_PROTO(const struct sk_buff *skb, int len), TP_ARGS(skb, len), TP_STRUCT__entry( __field( const void *, skbaddr ) __field( int, len ) ), TP_fast_assign( __entry->skbaddr = skb; __entry->len = len; ), TP_printk("skbaddr=%p len=%d", __entry->skbaddr, __entry->len) ); #endif /* _TRACE_SKB_H */ /* This part must be outside protection */ #include alue='switch'/> net-next plumbingsTobias Klauser
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /net/bluetooth/hidp
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bluetooth/hidp')