/* $Id: iga.h,v 1.2 1999/09/11 22:56:31 zaitcev Exp $ * iga1682.h: Sparc/PCI iga1682 driver constants etc. * * Copyleft 1998 V. Roganov and G. Raiko */ #ifndef _IGA1682_H #define _IGA1682_H 1 #define IGA_ATTR_CTL 0x3C0 #define IGA_IDX_VGA_OVERSCAN 0x11 #define DAC_W_INDEX 0x03C8 #define DAC_DATA 0x03C9 #define IGA_EXT_CNTRL 0x3CE #define IGA_IDX_EXT_BUS_CNTL 0x30 #define MEM_SIZE_ALIAS 0x3 #define MEM_SIZE_1M 0x0 #define MEM_SIZE_2M 0x1 #define MEM_SIZE_4M 0x2 #define MEM_SIZE_RESERVED 0x3 #define IGA_IDX_OVERSCAN_COLOR 0x58 #define IGA_IDX_EXT_MEM_2 0x72 #endif /* !(_IGA1682_H) */ '/cgit.cgi/'>index : net-next.git
net-next plumbingsTobias Klauser
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/net/dn_route.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /include/net/dn_route.h
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/net/dn_route.h')