#include #include #include #include "notifier-error-inject.h" static int priority; module_param(priority, int, 0); MODULE_PARM_DESC(priority, "specify netdevice notifier priority"); static struct notifier_err_inject netdev_notifier_err_inject = { .actions = { { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_REGISTER) }, { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_CHANGEMTU) }, { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_CHANGENAME) }, { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_PRE_UP) }, { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_PRE_TYPE_CHANGE) }, { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_POST_INIT) }, { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_PRECHANGEMTU) }, { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER) }, { NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_ACTION(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER) }, {} } }; static struct dentry *dir; static int netdev_err_inject_init(void) { int err; dir = notifier_err_inject_init("netdev", notifier_err_inject_dir, &netdev_notifier_err_inject, priority); if (IS_ERR(dir)) return PTR_ERR(dir); err = register_netdevice_notifier(&netdev_notifier_err_inject.nb); if (err) debugfs_remove_recursive(dir); return err; } static void netdev_err_inject_exit(void) { unregister_netdevice_notifier(&netdev_notifier_err_inject.nb); debugfs_remove_recursive(dir); } module_init(netdev_err_inject_init); module_exit(netdev_err_inject_exit); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Netdevice notifier error injection module"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Nikolay Aleksandrov "); 66c2c98db306dc91c480d9fbde35cc9'>refslogtreecommitdiff
'/cgit.cgi/linux/net-next.git/commit/include/drm?id=91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a'>drm/drm_displayid.h
diff options
ModeNameSize
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /include/drm/drm_displayid.h
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/drm/drm_displayid.h')