/* net/atm/common.h - ATM sockets (common part for PVC and SVC) */ /* Written 1995-2000 by Werner Almesberger, EPFL LRC/ICA */ #ifndef NET_ATM_COMMON_H #define NET_ATM_COMMON_H #include #include /* for poll_table */ int vcc_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol, int family, int kern); int vcc_release(struct socket *sock); int vcc_connect(struct socket *sock, int itf, short vpi, int vci); int vcc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, int flags); int vcc_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len); unsigned int vcc_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait); int vcc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); int vcc_compat_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); int vcc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, char __user *optval, unsigned int optlen); int vcc_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen); void vcc_process_recv_queue(struct atm_vcc *vcc); int atmpvc_init(void); void atmpvc_exit(void); int atmsvc_init(void); void atmsvc_exit(void); int atm_sysfs_init(void); void atm_sysfs_exit(void); #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS int atm_proc_init(void); void atm_proc_exit(void); #else static inline int atm_proc_init(void) { return 0; } static inline void atm_proc_exit(void) { /* nothing */ } #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ /* SVC */ int svc_change_qos(struct atm_vcc *vcc,struct atm_qos *qos); void atm_dev_release_vccs(struct atm_dev *dev); #endif linux/net-next.git/?h=nds-private-remove'>summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c')