/* * Copyright 2008, Jouni Malinen * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as * published by the Free Software Foundation. */ #ifndef AES_CMAC_H #define AES_CMAC_H #include void gf_mulx(u8 *pad); void aes_cmac_vector(struct crypto_cipher *tfm, size_t num_elem, const u8 *addr[], const size_t *len, u8 *mac, size_t mac_len); struct crypto_cipher *ieee80211_aes_cmac_key_setup(const u8 key[], size_t key_len); void ieee80211_aes_cmac(struct crypto_cipher *tfm, const u8 *aad, const u8 *data, size_t data_len, u8 *mic); void ieee80211_aes_cmac_256(struct crypto_cipher *tfm, const u8 *aad, const u8 *data, size_t data_len, u8 *mic); void ieee80211_aes_cmac_key_free(struct crypto_cipher *tfm); #endif /* AES_CMAC_H */ form method='get'> net-next plumbingsTobias Klauser
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'security/security.c')
oul@intel.com>
2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /security/keys/encrypted-keys/masterkey_trusted.c
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/keys/encrypted-keys/masterkey_trusted.c')