#!/bin/sh srctree=$(dirname "$0") SHOW_ERROR= if [ "$1" = "--show-error" ] ; then SHOW_ERROR=1 shift || true fi gccplugins_dir=$($3 -print-file-name=plugin) plugincc=$($1 -E -x c++ - -o /dev/null -I"${srctree}"/gcc-plugins -I"${gccplugins_dir}"/include 2>&1 <= 4008 || defined(ENABLE_BUILD_WITH_CXX) #warning $2 CXX #else #warning $1 CC #endif EOF ) if [ $? -ne 0 ] then if [ -n "$SHOW_ERROR" ] ; then echo "${plugincc}" >&2 fi exit 1 fi case "$plugincc" in *"$1 CC"*) echo "$1" exit 0 ;; *"$2 CXX"*) # the c++ compiler needs another test, see below ;; *) exit 1 ;; esac # we need a c++ compiler that supports the designated initializer GNU extension plugincc=$($2 -c -x c++ -std=gnu++98 - -fsyntax-only -I"${srctree}"/gcc-plugins -I"${gccplugins_dir}"/include 2>&1 <&2 fi exit 1 alue='emaclite-cleanup'>emaclite-cleanup net-next plumbingsTobias Klauser
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/build/feature/test-llvm-version.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>2017-01-11 14:00:21 +0100
committerVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>2017-01-25 15:35:11 +0530
commit91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch)
tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /tools/build/feature/test-llvm-version.cpp
parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/build/feature/test-llvm-version.cpp')