config SND_ATMEL_SOC
tristate "SoC Audio for the Atmel System-on-Chip"
depends on HAS_IOMEM
help
Say Y or M if you want to add support for codecs attached to
the ATMEL SSC interface. You will also need
to select the audio interfaces to support below.
if SND_ATMEL_SOC
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC
tristate
depends on HAS_DMA
default m if SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC=m && SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC=m
default y if SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC=y || (SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC=m && SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC=y)
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC
tristate
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA
tristate
select SND_SOC_GENERIC_DMAENGINE_PCM
default m if SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA=m && SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC=m
default y if SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA=y || (SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA=m && SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC=y)
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA
tristate
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC
tristate
default y if SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA=y || SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC=y
default m if SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA=m || SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC=m
config SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9G20_WM8731
tristate "SoC Audio support for WM8731-based At91sam9g20 evaluation board"
depends on ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST
depends on ATMEL_SSC && SND_SOC_I2C_AND_SPI
select SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC
select SND_SOC_WM8731
help
Say Y if you want to add support for SoC audio on WM8731-based
AT91sam9g20 evaluation board.
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_WM8904
tristate "Atmel ASoC driver for boards using WM8904 codec"
depends on ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST
depends on ATMEL_SSC && I2C
select SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA
select SND_SOC_WM8904
help
Say Y if you want to add support for Atmel ASoC driver for boards using
WM8904 codec.
config SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9X5_WM8731
tristate "SoC Audio support for WM8731-based at91sam9x5 board"
depends on ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST
depends on ATMEL_SSC && SND_SOC_I2C_AND_SPI
select SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA
select SND_SOC_WM8731
help
Say Y if you want to add support for audio SoC on an
at91sam9x5 based board that is using WM8731 codec.
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_CLASSD
tristate "Atmel ASoC driver for boards using CLASSD"
depends on ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST
select SND_ATMEL_SOC_DMA
select REGMAP_MMIO
help
Say Y if you want to add support for Atmel ASoC driver for boards using
CLASSD.
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDMIC
tristate "Atmel ASoC driver for boards using PDMIC"
depends on OF && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)
select SND_SOC_GENERIC_DMAENGINE_PCM
select REGMAP_MMIO
help
Say Y if you want to add support for Atmel ASoC driver for boards using
PDMIC.
config SND_ATMEL_SOC_TSE850_PCM5142
tristate "ASoC driver for the Axentia TSE-850"
depends on ARCH_AT91 && OF
depends on ATMEL_SSC && I2C
select SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_DMA
select SND_SOC_PCM512x_I2C
help
Say Y if you want to add support for the ASoC driver for the
Axentia TSE-850 with a PCM5142 codec.
endif
git.cgi/linux/net-next.git/commit/sound?id=91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a'>sound/soc/codecs/tpa6130a2.c
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the
following double-lock bug:
Double lock:
1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236;
2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after;
3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753;
4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505.
I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski.
First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions
`pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids
the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'.
NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes
`list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock',
whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by
`pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly
`pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under
`pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'.
Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and
`pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is
only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already
held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from
`pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from
`pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of
`pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there
cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points.
Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>