# Au1200/Au1550 PSC audio
snd-soc-au1xpsc-dbdma-objs := dbdma2.o
snd-soc-au1xpsc-i2s-objs := psc-i2s.o
snd-soc-au1xpsc-ac97-objs := psc-ac97.o
# Au1000/1500/1100 Audio units
snd-soc-au1x-dma-objs := dma.o
snd-soc-au1x-ac97c-objs := ac97c.o
snd-soc-au1x-i2sc-objs := i2sc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AU1XPSC) += snd-soc-au1xpsc-dbdma.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AU1XPSC_I2S) += snd-soc-au1xpsc-i2s.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AU1XPSC_AC97) += snd-soc-au1xpsc-ac97.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AU1XAUDIO) += snd-soc-au1x-dma.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AU1XAC97C) += snd-soc-au1x-ac97c.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AU1XI2SC) += snd-soc-au1x-i2sc.o
# Boards
snd-soc-db1000-objs := db1000.o
snd-soc-db1200-objs := db1200.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_DB1000) += snd-soc-db1000.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_DB1200) += snd-soc-db1200.o
>
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the
following double-lock bug:
Double lock:
1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236;
2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after;
3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753;
4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505.
I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski.
First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions
`pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids
the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'.
NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes
`list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock',
whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by
`pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly
`pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under
`pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'.
Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and
`pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is
only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already
held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from
`pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from
`pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of
`pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there
cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points.
Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu>
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>