[
{
"EventCode": "0x5C",
"UMask": "0x1",
"BriefDescription": "Unhalted core cycles when the thread is in ring 0",
"Counter": "0,1,2,3",
"EventName": "CPL_CYCLES.RING0",
"PublicDescription": "This event counts the unhalted core cycles during which the thread is in the ring 0 privileged mode.",
"SampleAfterValue": "2000003",
"CounterHTOff": "0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7"
},
{
"EventCode": "0x5C",
"UMask": "0x2",
"BriefDescription": "Unhalted core cycles when thread is in rings 1, 2, or 3",
"Counter": "0,1,2,3",
"EventName": "CPL_CYCLES.RING123",
"PublicDescription": "This event counts unhalted core cycles during which the thread is in rings 1, 2, or 3.",
"SampleAfterValue": "2000003",
"CounterHTOff": "0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7"
},
{
"EdgeDetect": "1",
"EventCode": "0x5C",
"UMask": "0x1",
"BriefDescription": "Number of intervals between processor halts while thread is in ring 0",
"Counter": "0,1,2,3",
"EventName": "CPL_CYCLES.RING0_TRANS",
"CounterMask": "1",
"PublicDescription": "This event counts when there is a transition from ring 1,2 or 3 to ring0.",
"SampleAfterValue": "100007",
"CounterHTOff": "0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7"
},
{
"EventCode": "0x63",
"UMask": "0x1",
"BriefDescription": "Cycles when L1 and L2 are locked due to UC or split lock",
"Counter": "0,1,2,3",
"EventName": "LOCK_CYCLES.SPLIT_LOCK_UC_LOCK_DURATION",
"PublicDescription": "This event counts cycles in which the L1 and L2 are locked due to a UC lock or split lock. A lock is asserted in case of locked memory access, due to noncacheable memory, locked operation that spans two cache lines, or a page walk from the noncacheable page table. L1D and L2 locks have a very high performance penalty and it is highly recommended to avoid such access.",
"SampleAfterValue": "2000003",
"CounterHTOff": "0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7"
}
]eca944be9cd23dfc752'>commitdiff
|
PCI/MSI: Don't apply affinity if there aren't enough vectors left
Bart reported a problem wіth an out of bounds access in the low-level IRQ
affinity code, which we root caused to the qla2xxx driver assigning all its
MSI-X vectors to the pre and post vectors, and not having any left for the
actually spread IRQs.
Fix this issue by not asking for affinity assignment when there are no
vectors to assign left.
Fixes: 402723ad5c62 ("PCI/MSI: Provide pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity()")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1485359225.3093.3.camel@sandisk.com
Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>