#include "../cache.h"
#include "progress.h"
static void null_progress__update(struct ui_progress *p __maybe_unused)
{
}
static struct ui_progress_ops null_progress__ops =
{
.update = null_progress__update,
};
struct ui_progress_ops *ui_progress__ops = &null_progress__ops;
void ui_progress__update(struct ui_progress *p, u64 adv)
{
p->curr += adv;
if (p->curr >= p->next) {
p->next += p->step;
ui_progress__ops->update(p);
}
}
void ui_progress__init(struct ui_progress *p, u64 total, const char *title)
{
p->curr = 0;
p->next = p->step = total / 16;
p->total = total;
p->title = title;
}
void ui_progress__finish(void)
{
if (ui_progress__ops->finish)
ui_progress__ops->finish();
}
class='main'>index : net-next.git |
| net-next plumbings | Tobias Klauser |
pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler
According to VLI64 Intel Atom E3800 Specification Update (#329901)
concurrent read accesses may result in returning 0xffffffff and write
accesses may be dropped silently.
To workaround all accesses must be protected by locks.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>