summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/net/tso.h
blob: b7be852bfe9d5719aa86df7d788224a64fbce775 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
#ifndef _TSO_H
#define _TSO_H

#include <net/ip.h>

struct tso_t {
	int next_frag_idx;
	void *data;
	size_t size;
	u16 ip_id;
	bool ipv6;
	u32 tcp_seq;
};

int tso_count_descs(struct sk_buff *skb);
void tso_build_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb, char *hdr, struct tso_t *tso,
		   int size, bool is_last);
void tso_build_data(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tso_t *tso, int size);
void tso_start(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tso_t *tso);

#endif	/* _TSO_H */
it.cgi/linux/net-next.git/commit/include/dt-bindings/dma/sun4i-a10.h?id=91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a'>91539eb1fda2d530d3b268eef542c5414e54bf1a (patch) tree960f5ca6342ad20837aff18aad6e8ecd7da32fd6 /include/dt-bindings/dma/sun4i-a10.h parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/dt-bindings/dma/sun4i-a10.h')