summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sound/soc/samsung/spdif.h
blob: 4f72cb446dbf06e94f6d6d175f898e0db9e8fc27 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
/* sound/soc/samsung/spdif.h
 *
 * ALSA SoC Audio Layer - Samsung S/PDIF Controller driver
 *
 * Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
 *		http://www.samsung.com/
 *
 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
 * published by the Free Software Foundation.
 */

#ifndef __SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SPDIF_H
#define __SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SPDIF_H	__FILE__

#define SND_SOC_SPDIF_INT_MCLK		0
#define SND_SOC_SPDIF_EXT_MCLK		1

#endif	/* __SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SPDIF_H */
/nfsd/nfs2acl.c parent6610d0edf6dc7ee97e46ab3a538a565c79d26199 (diff)
dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfsd/nfs2acl.c')