diff options
author | Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> | 2013-03-15 14:22:48 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> | 2013-03-15 14:22:48 +0100 |
commit | 751c3e907432b9848f1b625a5e54fa2dcfab3b2d (patch) | |
tree | 2c7b2de460d25a8f849e5ffb16ddf1442b68c5f8 /Documentation/Workflow | |
parent | 271c2f65bf0acbfe1220822e7d471e0f18d329df (diff) |
docs: add initial workflow document
Trying to document the workflow that comes along with using this Git
repository. Further ideas, additions to this document are welcome to
create a unified frame for all maintainers, developers and (advanced)
users.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/Workflow')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/Workflow | 64 |
1 files changed, 64 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/Workflow b/Documentation/Workflow new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9ff3c45 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/Workflow @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +Repository Workflow: +//////////////////// + +Here are some guidelines for users or developers regarding the work with this +Git repository. + +* Users: + +- steps to verify a release tag can be done with GPG: + git show maint-dborkman-pgp-pub | gpg --import + git show maint-tklauser-pgp-pub | gpg --import + git tag -v <tag-name> + +* Developers: + +- steps to submit a patch: + we follow in general a similar submission process as in the Linux kernel + read https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches + read Documentation/SubmittingPatches + if a commit was acknowledged by someone, add + Acked-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org> + if a bug was reported by someone, add + Reported-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org> + if a feature was suggested by someone, add + Suggested-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org> + if a commit was tested by someone, add + Tested-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org> + if a commit was reviewed by someone, add + Reviewed-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org> + if a bug was bisected by someone, add + Bisected-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org> + in case tagging as mentioned above already happened internally + in your company by different persons, you can add those tags + before submission into the patch commit message + in case someone on the mailing list adds his/her *-by tag, it's the + job of the maintainer to keep track of that and to apply this properly + +* Maintainer: + +- steps to add your public GPG key: + gpg --gen-key [...] + gpg --list-keys [take the pubkey id you want to add] + gpg -a --export <pubid> | git hash-object -w --stdin + <git-object-id> + git tag -a maint-<short-name>-pgp-pub <git-object-id> + <log: Public key of <full name>.> + git push --tags + +- steps to make a new release: + set proper versioning in the Makefile itself + make release + git push --tags + upload tarballs to public dir + update website + email generated .MAIL_MSG to the mailing list, include + bcc to the maintainers listed in Documentation/Downstream + +- apply patches from non-maintainers, basic rules to follow: + preferred are patches that have been sent via git send-email + never do an automatic Github merge in case the pull request came from there + in case of Github we need to do cherry-picking + if it's a pull request, make sure it does not contain merges itself + always add your Signed-off-by to the commit message in case of an apply + patches must be rejected in case the developer's Signed-off-by is missing |