summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/proto_tcp.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVadim Kochan <vadim4j@gmail.com>2016-01-05 21:42:40 +0200
committerTobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>2016-01-12 09:16:11 +0100
commit5163796ab0f772d8f3bc8473e92d401d67cbe6bd (patch)
tree588c046a3894c89f8c244dd018fd730c842f4347 /proto_tcp.c
parent1248d8856a9f20caa601134b424c71b2c98e76b5 (diff)
flowtop: Use one nfct handle for dump & refresh flows
Simplify dump & flows refreshing via one nfct handle, which is enough. Signed-off-by: Vadim Kochan <vadim4j@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'proto_tcp.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
generated by cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf (git 2.39.0) at 2024-11-10 06:18:56 +0000
.30% ) The first run above is without any tracing, just to get a based figure. hackbench takes ~0.79 seconds to run on the system. The second run enables tracing all events where nothing is filtered. This increases the time by 100% and hackbench takes 1.57 seconds to run. The third run filters all events where the preempt count will equal "20" (this should never happen) thus all events are discarded. This takes 1.69 seconds to run. This is 10% slower than just committing the events! The last run enables all events and filters where the filter will commit all events, and this takes 1.70 seconds to run. The filtering overhead is approximately 10%. Thus, the discard and commit of an event from the ring buffer may be about the same time. With this patch, the numbers change: # trace-cmd start -p nop # perf stat -r 10 hackbench 50 0.778233033 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.38% ) # trace-cmd start -e all # perf stat -r 10 hackbench 50 1.582102692 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.28% ) # trace-cmd start -e all -f 'common_preempt_count==20' # perf stat -r 10 hackbench 50 1.309230710 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.22% ) # trace-cmd start -e all -f 'common_preempt_count!=20' # perf stat -r 10 hackbench 50 1.786001924 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.20% ) The first run is again the base with no tracing. The second run is all tracing with no filtering. It is a little slower, but that may be well within the noise. The third run shows that discarding all events only took 1.3 seconds. This is a speed up of 23%! The discard is much faster than even the commit. The one downside is shown in the last run. Events that are not discarded by the filter will take longer to add, this is due to the extra copy of the event. Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Diffstat