| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We should also make this clear from the beginning that one can use
bpfc for seccomps as well. Might be interesting for security
researchers to play around with.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
|
|
Just shortly also mention JIT disassembler in conjunction with bpfc.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
|
|
We should only put the things here that are interesting for users,
thus, add steps to verify a release from the Workflow document.
[1] http://pub.netsniff-ng.org/docs/Workflow
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
|
|
We decided to get rid of the old Git history and start a new one for
several reasons:
*) Allow / enforce only high-quality commits (which was not the case
for many commits in the history), have a policy that is more close
to the one from the Linux kernel. With high quality commits, we
mean code that is logically split into commits and commit messages
that are signed-off and have a proper subject and message body.
We do not allow automatic Github merges anymore, since they are
total bullshit. However, we will either cherry-pick your patches
or pull them manually.
*) The old archive was about ~27MB for no particular good reason.
This basically derived from the bad decision that also some PDF
files where stored there. From this moment onwards, no binary
objects are allowed to be stored in this repository anymore.
The old archive is not wiped away from the Internet. You will still
be able to find it, e.g. on git.cryptoism.org etc.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
|
