summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-04-10docs: be more precise on readme with experimental toolsDaniel Borkmann1-5/+6
Just improve the note on tools that are still experimental. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
2013-09-19doc: readme: give note about what tools are still experimentalDaniel Borkmann1-2/+5
We still have to get curvetun and mausezahn in line with the rest of the landscape, as they are not ready and in a quality we wish they would be. Therefore, mark and document them as experiemental for now until they are fixed up. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
2013-07-10README: Adjust mention of sponsorsTobias Klauser1-2/+3
The sponsors have been moved to AUTHORS from Sponsors in commit 9d310488 ("docs: move sponsor names into authors "), thus adjust the pointer to them in README accordingly. Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
2013-06-24README, INSTALL: minor: Remove trailing whitespacesTobias Klauser1-2/+2
Remove some trailing whitespaces from documentation. Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
2013-06-15docs: readme: also stress bpf seccomp in the README pageDaniel Borkmann1-1/+1
We should also make this clear from the beginning that one can use bpfc for seccomps as well. Might be interesting for security researchers to play around with. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
2013-05-27docs: readme: just shortly also mention JIT disassemblerDaniel Borkmann1-1/+1
Just shortly also mention JIT disassembler in conjunction with bpfc. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
2013-04-11docs: readme: add steps to verify a Git releaseDaniel Borkmann1-15/+16
We should only put the things here that are interesting for users, thus, add steps to verify a release from the Workflow document. [1] http://pub.netsniff-ng.org/docs/Workflow Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
2013-03-15all: import netsniff-ng 0.5.8-rc0 sourceDaniel Borkmann1-0/+58
We decided to get rid of the old Git history and start a new one for several reasons: *) Allow / enforce only high-quality commits (which was not the case for many commits in the history), have a policy that is more close to the one from the Linux kernel. With high quality commits, we mean code that is logically split into commits and commit messages that are signed-off and have a proper subject and message body. We do not allow automatic Github merges anymore, since they are total bullshit. However, we will either cherry-pick your patches or pull them manually. *) The old archive was about ~27MB for no particular good reason. This basically derived from the bad decision that also some PDF files where stored there. From this moment onwards, no binary objects are allowed to be stored in this repository anymore. The old archive is not wiped away from the Internet. You will still be able to find it, e.g. on git.cryptoism.org etc. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>