summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ipv4.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-06-04misc: cleanup header commentsDaniel Borkmann1-7/+0
Remove header comments where appropriate. And also clean up colorize a bit. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
2013-03-15all: import netsniff-ng 0.5.8-rc0 sourceDaniel Borkmann1-0/+36
We decided to get rid of the old Git history and start a new one for several reasons: *) Allow / enforce only high-quality commits (which was not the case for many commits in the history), have a policy that is more close to the one from the Linux kernel. With high quality commits, we mean code that is logically split into commits and commit messages that are signed-off and have a proper subject and message body. We do not allow automatic Github merges anymore, since they are total bullshit. However, we will either cherry-pick your patches or pull them manually. *) The old archive was about ~27MB for no particular good reason. This basically derived from the bad decision that also some PDF files where stored there. From this moment onwards, no binary objects are allowed to be stored in this repository anymore. The old archive is not wiped away from the Internet. You will still be able to find it, e.g. on git.cryptoism.org etc. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
afb542503781f11b9cce91e285'>diff)
Merge branch 'sparc32-cosmetic-changes'
Sam Ravnborg says: ==================== sparc32: kgdb_32 and STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS updates A few cosmetic pathes for sparc32 follows. I noticed some inconsistency in kgdb_32 that triggered a few patches. The inconsistency in kgdb_32 turned out to have no functional impact. But I anyway fixed it so kgdb_32 and kgdb_64 became just a tiny bit more alike. The STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS patch was triggered by a discussion on linux-arch where Arnd considered removing this cruft. The resulting benary of srmmu.c (I checked an assembler file) was _smaller_ when I defined STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS. But due to lack of testing I left it undefined. With the build errors fixed it should be trivial to try out if defining STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS breaks anything. Any takers? As I miss any working sparc32 gear for the moment this has only been build tested - so please consider if it is worth taking the risk to apply the patches. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat