Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block

Pull block fixes from Jens Axboe:
 "A set of fixes for this series. This contains:

   - Set of fixes for the nvme target code

   - A revert of patch from this merge window, causing a regression with
     WRITE_SAME on iSCSI targets at least.

   - A fix for a use-after-free in the new O_DIRECT bdev code.

   - Two fixes for the xen-blkfront driver"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
  Revert "sd: remove __data_len hack for WRITE SAME"
  nvme-fc: use blk_rq_nr_phys_segments
  nvmet-rdma: Fix missing dma sync to nvme data structures
  nvmet: Call fatal_error from keep-alive timout expiration
  nvmet: cancel fatal error and flush async work before free controller
  nvmet: delete controllers deletion upon subsystem release
  nvmet_fc: correct logic in disconnect queue LS handling
  block: fix use after free in __blkdev_direct_IO
  xen-blkfront: correct maximum segment accounting
  xen-blkfront: feature flags handling adjustments

path: root/REPORTING-BUGS

For reporting bugs send an email to the <netsniff-ng@googlegroups.com> list.

Alternatively, you can create an issue on our Github project:

  * https://github.com/netsniff-ng/netsniff-ng/issues

If you use Fedora or have a RHEL subscription, you can also report bugs to:

  * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

If you use Debian Linux, we might also process / track bugs there:

  * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=netsniff-ng

In any way, you'll get a reply from us. Please do not contact individual
developers directly in case of netsniff-ng issues or patches, but rather
always our mailing list. By this, you're not wasting time of a single
developer and increase your chances of getting a reply from us.

In general, we are also highly interested in how you use the toolkit, what
problems you are trying to solve and what kind of things you would like to have
improved. So feel free to drop us some feature requests as well.