x86/microcode/intel: Drop stashed AP patch pointer optimization

This was meant to save us the scanning of the microcode containter in
the initrd since the first AP had already done that but it can also hurt
us:

Imagine a single hyperthreaded CPU (Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270, for
example) which updates the microcode on the BSP but since the microcode
engine is shared between the two threads, the update on CPU1 doesn't
happen because it has already happened on CPU0 and we don't find a newer
microcode revision on CPU1.

Which doesn't set the intel_ucode_patch pointer and at initrd
jettisoning time we don't save the microcode patch for later
application.

Now, when we suspend to RAM, the loaded microcode gets cleared so we
need to reload but there's no patch saved in the cache.

Removing the optimization fixes this issue and all is fine and dandy.

Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading")
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170120202955.4091-2-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

path: root/REPORTING-BUGS

For reporting bugs send an email to the <netsniff-ng@googlegroups.com> list.

If you use Fedora or have a RHEL subscription, you can also report bugs to:

  * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

If you use Debian Linux, we might also process / track bugs there:

  * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=netsniff-ng

In any way, you'll get a reply from us. Please do not contact individual
developers directly in case of netsniff-ng issues or patches, but rather
always our mailing list. By this, you're not wasting time of a single
developer and increase your chances of getting a reply from us.

In general, we are also highly interested in how you use the toolkit, what
problems you are trying to sovle and what kind of things you would like to have
improved. So feel free to drop us some feature requests as well.