summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bpf_comp.c
blob: eca2507c5cb86d6b9ff28a7ca1a77341bf6709e0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
/*
 * netsniff-ng - the packet sniffing beast
 * Copyright 2013 Daniel Borkmann.
 * Subject to the GPL, version 2.
 */

#include <pcap.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>

#include "xmalloc.h"
#include "config.h"
#include "bpf.h"
#include "die.h"

void bpf_try_compile(const char *rulefile, struct sock_fprog *bpf, uint32_t link_type)
{
	int i, ret;
	const struct bpf_insn *ins;
	struct sock_filter *out;
	struct bpf_program _bpf;

	ret = pcap_compile_nopcap(65535, link_type, &_bpf, rulefile, 1, 0xffffffff);
	if (ret < 0)
		panic("Cannot compile filter: %s\n", rulefile);

	bpf->len = _bpf.bf_len;
	bpf->filter = xrealloc(bpf->filter, bpf->len * sizeof(*out));

	for (i = 0, ins = _bpf.bf_insns, out = bpf->filter; i < bpf->len;
	     ++i, ++ins, ++out) {
		out->code = ins->code;
		out->jt = ins->jt;
		out->jf = ins->jf;
		out->k = ins->k;

		if (out->code == 0x06 && out->k > 0)
			out->k = 0xFFFFFFFF;
	}

	pcap_freecode(&_bpf);

	if (__bpf_validate(bpf) == 0)
		panic("This is not a valid BPF program!\n");
}
fc64a3fe9572ee33588363 (diff)
pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler
According to VLI64 Intel Atom E3800 Specification Update (#329901) concurrent read accesses may result in returning 0xffffffff and write accesses may be dropped silently. To workaround all accesses must be protected by locks. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/9p')