summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sound/oss/os.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>2015-09-01 08:57:55 +0200
committerMarc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>2017-02-06 15:13:42 +0100
commit9eb7aa891101a4a09114ff3191f9877ea35eae06 (patch)
tree33826e4957f696a23f55d007d71a44490082b5bd /sound/oss/os.h
parent4bd888a80b1d48dbd83f1cbf806e923a30051958 (diff)
can: flexcan: add quirk FLEXCAN_QUIRK_ENABLE_EACEN_RRS
In order to receive RTR frames in the non HW FIFO mode the RSS and EACEN bits of the reg_ctrl2 have to be activated. As this has no side effect in the FIFO mode, we do this unconditionally on cores with the reg_ctrl2. Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'sound/oss/os.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
generated by cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf (git 2.39.0) at 2025-03-01 11:05:11 +0000
s='commit-subject'>dmaengine: pl330: fix double lock
The static bug finder EBA (http://www.iagoabal.eu/eba/) reported the following double-lock bug: Double lock: 1. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at pl330_free_chan_resources:2236; 2. call to function `pl330_release_channel' immediately after; 3. call to function `dma_pl330_rqcb' in line 1753; 4. spin_lock_irqsave(pch->lock, flags) at dma_pl330_rqcb:1505. I have fixed it as suggested by Marek Szyprowski. First, I have replaced `pch->lock' with `pl330->lock' in functions `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' and `pl330_free_chan_resources'. This avoids the double-lock by acquiring a different lock than `dma_pl330_rqcb'. NOTE that, as a result, `pl330_free_chan_resources' executes `list_splice_tail_init' on `pch->work_list' under lock `pl330->lock', whereas in the rest of the code `pch->work_list' is protected by `pch->lock'. I don't know if this may cause race conditions. Similarly `pch->cyclic' is written by `pl330_alloc_chan_resources' under `pl330->lock' but read by `pl330_tx_submit' under `pch->lock'. Second, I have removed locking from `pl330_request_channel' and `pl330_release_channel' functions. Function `pl330_request_channel' is only called from `pl330_alloc_chan_resources', so the lock is already held. Function `pl330_release_channel' is called from `pl330_free_chan_resources', which already holds the lock, and from `pl330_del'. Function `pl330_del' is called in an error path of `pl330_probe' and at the end of `pl330_remove', but I assume that there cannot be concurrent accesses to the protected data at those points. Signed-off-by: Iago Abal <mail@iagoabal.eu> Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/ivytown/memory.json')