MIPS: store the appended dtb address in a variable

Instead of rewriting the arguments to match the UHI spec, store the
address of a appended or UHI supplied dtb in fw_supplied_dtb.

That way the original bootloader arugments are kept intact while still
making the use of an appended dtb invisible for mach code.

Mach code can still find out if it is an appended dtb by comparing
fw_arg1 with fw_supplied_dtb.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Alban Bedel <albeu@free.fr>
Cc: Daniel Gimpelevich <daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>
Cc: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13699/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

path: root/REPORTING-BUGS

For reporting bugs send an email to the <netsniff-ng@googlegroups.com> list.

Alternatively, you can create an issue on our Github project:

  * https://github.com/netsniff-ng/netsniff-ng/issues

If you use Fedora or have a RHEL subscription, you can also report bugs to:

  * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

If you use Debian Linux, we might also process / track bugs there:

  * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=netsniff-ng

In any way, you'll get a reply from us. Please do not contact individual
developers directly in case of netsniff-ng issues or patches, but rather
always our mailing list. By this, you're not wasting time of a single
developer and increase your chances of getting a reply from us.

In general, we are also highly interested in how you use the toolkit, what
problems you are trying to solve and what kind of things you would like to have
improved. So feel free to drop us some feature requests as well.